Daniel Radcliffe’s naughty nude bits

4 April, 2008

Although the boys are not usually in the business of showing naughty bits, they just couldn’t resist this one.

It’s firmly plastered to Andy’s fridge, and it’s also posted here. That’s right, Daniel Radcliffe got frisky with a horse in 2007 in the stage show Eqqus, and here’s a full-frontal nude shot to prove it.

That’s a nice wand you have there Harry - and don’t listen to what everyone else is saying, we certainly don’t think it’s a fake at all.

BEWARE: Click here and really will see Daniel nude. Make sure you are allowed to click here and don’t blame us if you don’t want to see it!

Share on Facebook

Entry Filed under: Random Ramblings. Tags: , , , .

15 Comments Add your own

  • 1. mayara  |  6 April, 2008 at 6:40 am

    i love herry potter …

    daniel redcliff e um bom ator…ele é dimais

    alem de ser um bom ator é muito bonito …

    que pena que ele não mora aqui no brasil ☺

    •○ eu amo de ++++

    beijãooooo

  • 2. Tabitha  |  11 June, 2008 at 12:12 pm

    I think that is a really bad picture and I hate I think it is very inappropriate for u to have on google, if u want 2 put bad photos like that online than put it on like a playboy site or a gay guy site no affense to and gay guys that read this im not racist or anything I just think this is a really inappropriate picture kids go on google and when they type in danielle radcliff they shouldnt see nude photos of him even if it is not a true photo

  • 3. S  |  13 June, 2008 at 8:17 am

    i understand where tabitha is coming from and i fully agree with her when she says that the photo should not be on google because of all the kids who go on to google to look at photos of D.R but as for her comment i think she needs to take a few english classes…..just a thought!

  • 4. A&A  |  13 June, 2008 at 9:35 pm

    Hi Tabitha. Thankyou for your comments, which we take very seriously. Search engines like Google have strict ‘Safe Search’ functionality which, if enabled, will prevent photos such as this appearing. But, in addition to that, we have beefed up the warning message, taken off any text referring to ‘HP’ (which children may search for as opposed to Daniel Radcliffe) and made sure there is an extra click to the get to the photo. As Daniel is a public figure, agreed to perform in Eqqus and these are not ‘paparazzi’ photos, we believe we they are ok to stay up. Again, thankyou for your comments.

  • 5. Michelle  |  14 June, 2008 at 1:41 am

    This is is so fake! And there’s hardly any pictures anyway! This is shit.

  • 6. KENNETH BOWRY  |  16 June, 2008 at 1:51 am

    Nice photo,whats all the fuss about,some people are so uptight

  • 7. katy  |  19 June, 2008 at 11:10 pm

    Hi,
    Here’s a fact…google search engiene is for EVERYONE…Yes, that’s right…it’s for adults too…(dare I say it?)
    So don’t blame Daniel Radcliffe for putting artistic photos of himself on the internet…blame the parents for not having the censorship on. After all, google has to cater for EVERYONE…so be a responsible parent and put the censorship on and shut up about it, and let the rest of the world enjoy Potter’s magic wand…
    ;)

  • 8. Beckii  |  26 June, 2008 at 4:13 am

    OMFG!!

    that is cool…

    its not a fake though…

    u can tell

    and i agree with Katy

  • 9. indiangay  |  4 August, 2008 at 11:19 am

    despite gay, am more happy to see my favourte celeb. D.R naked. lovely C*** !!

  • 10. Simon Papson  |  31 August, 2008 at 12:53 pm

    This is a fake pic. I actually have the original porn pic which the… um… “wand” was copied from - and they’re identical (the wands, I mean). This is very well done and, if you didn’t know it was fake, you can’t tell. But, as I say, I’ve seen the originals of both of the two photos which have been combined here.

    That doesn’t stop it being hot, though! Especially because the porn actor who’s featured (but not credited) in this picture is one of my favourites…

  • 11. koko  |  2 September, 2008 at 5:01 pm

    yeah as a reply to tabitha…there is a way to block explicit material off of google image search and it doesn’t matter if its on a porn site or watever type in the right words and you will find porn pics if the explicit material filter on google is not on. so dont blame these people blame those kid’s parents.

  • 12. von  |  10 September, 2008 at 3:29 am

    all i have to say is all of you looked this up!!
    you say it’s wrong but bottom line is you looked at it!!!
    if don’t want to see it don’t look it up…

  • 13. Nan  |  14 September, 2008 at 2:21 am

    He is gorgeous ~ Plain and simple.

  • 14. Dr. Pepper  |  25 October, 2008 at 2:48 pm

    This isn’t a fake, because Daniel Radcliffe really did do that Eqqus and was nude throughout. If it is a fake, then it’s very well done, and doesn’t change the fact that he really did get naked on stage.

  • 15. Carroll  |  31 October, 2008 at 4:08 pm

    This frontal photo of Daniel is fake. People who have seen the play say he is circumcised. Would love to see a real photo.

Leave a Comment

hidden

Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Welcome

Listen to the boys live Thursday mornings from 6:30 to 9am on JOY 94.9. Subscribe to Andy & Adrian email updates.

Page Links

You'll cack yourself over the A&A Facebook and YouTube pages: YouTube Facebook

The Guest Archives

Recently Popular Podcasts

Comments

Karen on The joys of commercial su…
Carroll on Daniel Radcliffe’s naugh…
Dr. Pepper on Daniel Radcliffe’s naugh…
A&A on The joys of commercial su…
Michael on The joys of commercial su…

Archives

Links